Kg. Miller et al., MIOCENE STABLE ISOTOPIC STRATIGRAPHY AND MAGNETOSTRATIGRAPHY OF BUFF BAY, JAMAICA, Geological Society of America bulletin, 106(12), 1994, pp. 1605-1620
Previously reported biostratigraphic relationships from middle-upper M
iocene sections exposed near Buff Bay, Jamaica (18-degrees-N, tropical
bioprovince), differ from the subtropical North Atlantic (Sites 563 a
nd 558). Time scales for this interval rely on correlations establishe
d at these subtropical sites, and the differences with the tropical se
ction have implications to global correlations. Planktonic foraminifer
al Zones N13 and N15 are thick at Buff Bay but are virtually absent at
Sites 563 and 558; nannofossil Zone NN9 is associated with Zone N15 a
nd uppermost Zone N14 at Buff Bay but is associated with Zone N16 at t
he other sites. Magnetostratigraphic data presented here further compl
icate the interpretation: Zone NN9 is associated with a thick normal m
agnetozone at Sites 563 and 558; at Buff Bay, it is associated with a
thick reversed magnetozone. Although a secondary magnetization at Buff
Bay makes it difficult to identify confidently Miocene normal magneto
zones, the thick reversed magnetozone most likely represents the paleo
magnetic field and correlates with Chron C5r. The magnetobiostratigrap
hic relationships require either diachrony of taxa or two mutually exc
lusive hiatuses in Jamaica and the North Atlantic. We address this pro
blem by analyzing benthic foraminiferal deltaO-18 and deltaC-13 from t
he Buff Bay section. These isotopic data allow us to evaluate three hy
potheses that reconcile the magneto-, bio-, and isotopic stratigraphic
data and conclude that the first and last occurrences of five taxa we
re diachronous by approximately 0.3-0.5 m.y. between tropical and subt
ropical locations. This requires revised age estimates for late middle
to early late Miocene biostratigraphic datum levels. We suggest that
the ranges of several taxa are useful for endemic tropical or subtropi
cal zonations, but correlations between the low and midlatitudes were
affected by an increase in latitudinal thermal gradients during the la
te middle Miocene. However, we admit that further studies are needed b
efore this issue is resolved.