THE RELEVANCE OF RECURRENT BRIEF DEPRESSION IN PRIMARY-CARE - A REPORT FROM THE WHO PROJECT ON PSYCHOLOGICAL-PROBLEMS IN GENERAL HEALTH-CARE CONDUCTED IN 14 COUNTRIES

Citation
E. Weiller et al., THE RELEVANCE OF RECURRENT BRIEF DEPRESSION IN PRIMARY-CARE - A REPORT FROM THE WHO PROJECT ON PSYCHOLOGICAL-PROBLEMS IN GENERAL HEALTH-CARE CONDUCTED IN 14 COUNTRIES, European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 244(4), 1994, pp. 182-189
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Neurosciences
ISSN journal
09401334
Volume
244
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
182 - 189
Database
ISI
SICI code
0940-1334(1994)244:4<182:TRORBD>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
This report from the WHO project on Psychological Problems in General Health Care examines the relevance in primary care of the concept of r ecurrent brief depression (RBD) proposed by Jules Angst. RBD refers to brief, severe depressive episodes that recur frequently, i.e. nearly once a month over a 1-year period, according to Angst. Using a structu red interview (CIDI), RBD was assessed in patients not meeting the cri teria for depressive episodes lasting at least 2 weeks, as defined in the ICD-10 (DE). A substantial proportion of primary care seekers were identified as presenting RBD without other depressive disorders, 3.7% with a formal RBD diagnosis and 2.7% with frequent but not monthly de pressive episodes. These two subgroups were found to differ very littl e in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, severity, disability, and comorbidity with other diagnoses. However, in patients with a form al diagnosis of RBD, a higher rate of history of suicide attempts was found (14.0%), similar to that observed in patients meeting the criter ia for DE. Most of the severity and disability indicators show that RB D is a severe condition, associated with substantial impairment, even if they show a higher degree of severity for DE. About one RBD patient out of three is recognized by general practitioners as presenting a p sychological disorder, a majority of whom are actually treated. Our re sults confirm the relevance of the concept of RBD in primary care, and the need to further explore the pertinence of the restrictive recurre nce criterion proposed by Angst.