A new approach termed ''fast-track recovery'' was undertaken at both t
he Baystate Medical Center and Hartford Hospital. The fast-track proto
col involves the following principles: (1) preoperative education; (2)
early extubation; (3) methylprednisolone sodium succinate before bypa
ss followed by dexamethasone for 24 hours postoperatively; (4) prophyl
actic digitalization, metoclopramide HCl, docusate sodium, and ranitid
ine HCl; (5) accelerated rehabilitation; (6) early discharge; (7) a de
dicated fast-track coordinator to perform both daily telephone contact
and a 1-week postoperative examination; and (8) a routine 1-month pos
toperative visit with a PA or MD. To evaluate the effects of this appr
oach on patient care, a retrospective 1-year analysis was undertaken i
n both institutions with all coronary artery bypass grafting patients
compared in a consecutive manner before the origin of the fast-track p
rotocol and subsequent to its beginning. There were 280 patients in th
e fast-track and 282 in the non-fast-track group. The two groups were
not significantly different except inexplicably there was a lower ejec
tion fraction in the fast-track group and a longer cross-clamp time. P
ostoperatively, the mean time to extubation decreased from 22.1 to 15.
4 hours, and peak weight gain decreased from 2.8 to 1.6 kg from the no
n-fast-track to the fast-track group (p < 0.01). This was accompanied
by significant (p < 0.001) decreases in intensive care unit duration f
rom 2.4 to 1.9 days and in postoperative length of stay from 8.3 to 6.
8 days from the non-fast-track to the fast-track group. There was no i
ncrease in morbidity or mortality associated with the fast-track proto
col either early or late. Thirty-day hospital readmission was not sign
ificantly different between the two groups. Fast-track methodology is
effective, and we routinely employ this approach for all patients unde
rgoing cardiopulmonary bypass.