Between 1981 and 1990, we prospectively tested the optimal pacing mode
for carotid sinus syndrome before pacemaker implantation by performin
g carotid sinus pressure during temporary pacing (VVI- and DVI-mode) a
nd invasive blood pressure monitoring. In a group of 61 patients with
carotid sinus syndrome (37 males, 24 females, mean age: 74 years), art
erial blood pressure was sufficiently maintained during VVI-pacing in
28, 33 patients needed dual-chamber pacing. During follow-up (mean: 61
.5 months), 75% of the patients were symptom-free, 8% reported symptom
s of minor intensity. Taking into consideration that in further 10% of
the patients persisting symptoms after pacemaker implantation might h
ave also been caused by other diseases like stenosis of the A. carotis
, pacemaker therapy of carotid sinus syndrome failed in only 7% of the
patients. Thus, the quantification of the effects of different pacing
modes on arterial blood pressure during carotid sinus pressure is a s
uitable preimplantation diagnostic tool to predict the success of pace
maker therapy, which has shown favorable results during longterm follo
w-up.