Aj. Douglas et al., CANCER MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY AMONG WORKERS AT THE SELLAFIELD PLANT OF BRITISH NUCLEAR-FUELS, British Journal of Cancer, 70(6), 1994, pp. 1232-1243
The mortality of all 14,282 workers employed at the Sellafield plant o
f British Nuclear Fuels between 1947 and 1975 was studied up to the en
d of 1988 and cancer incidence was examined from 1971 to 1986. This up
dates a previous report on mortality only up to the end of 1983. Ninet
y-nine per cent of the workers were traced satisfactorily. Cancer mort
ality was 4% less than that of England and Wales [standardised mortali
ty ratio (SMR) = 96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 90,103] and the sa
me as that of Cumbria (SMR = 100; Cl = 94,107). Cancer incidence was 1
0% less than that of England and Wales [standardised registration rati
o (SRR) = 90; Cl = 83,97] and 18% less than that of Northern Region (S
RR = 82; Cl = 75,88). Cancer mortality rates were significantly in exc
ess of national rates for cancers of the pleura (nine observed, 2.6 ex
pected; P = 0.001), thyroid (six observed, 1.8 expected; P = 0.01) and
ill defined and secondary sites (53 observed, 39.2 expected; P = 0.02
). There were significant deficits of cancers of the liver and gall bl
adder, larynx and lung. Among radiation workers there were significant
positive correlations between accumulated radiation dose and mortalit
y from cancers of ill-defined and secondary sites (10 year lag: P = 0.
01) and for leukaemia (2 year lag: P = 0.009), but not for cancers of
the pleura and thyroid cancer. Previous findings of such associations
with multiple myeloma and bladder cancer were less strong. There was a
significant excess of incident cases of cancer of the oesophagus (P =
0.01), but this was not associated with accumulated radiation dose. F
or cancers other than leukaemia, the dose-response risk estimates were
below those of the adult atomic bomb survivors, but the 90% confidenc
e interval included risks of zero and of 2-3 times higher. For leukaem
ia (12 deaths, excluding CLL), under an excess relative risk model, th
e risk estimate derived for the Sellafield workers was about four time
s higher than that for the adult atomic bomb survivors with a confiden
ce interval ranging from a half to nearly 20 times that of the atomic
bomb survivors. Overall, however, there was no excess of leukaemia amo
ng the workers compared with national rates.