Ea. Eisenhauer et al., EUROPEAN-CANADIAN RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PACLITAXEL IN RELAPSED OVARIAN-CANCER - HIGH-DOSE VERSUS LOW-DOSE AND LONG VERSUS SHORT INFUSION, Journal of clinical oncology, 12(12), 1994, pp. 2654-2666
Purpose: Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) is
a new anticancer agent with activity in a number of human tumors, incl
uding epithelial ovarian cancer. In nonrandomized trials, doses studie
d have ranged from 135 mg/m(2) to 250 mg/m(2) administered over 24 hou
rs with premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). This
study addressed two questions: the dose-response relationship of Taxo
l in relapsed ovarian cancer and the safety of a short infusion given
with premedication. Methods: Women with platinum-pretreated epithelial
ovarian cancer and measurable recurrent disease were randomized in ct
bifactorial design to receive either 175 or 135 mg/m(2) of Taxol over
either 24 or 3 hours. Major end points were the frequency of signific
ant HSRs and objective response rate. Secondary end points were progre
ssion-free and overall survival. Results: Of 407 patients randomized,
391 were eligible and 382 assessable for response. Analysis was perfor
med according to the bifactorial design. Severe HSRs were rare (1.5% p
atients) and were not affected by either dose or schedule. Response wa
s slightly higher at the 175-mg/m(2) dose (20%) than at 135 mg/m(2) (1
5%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .2). However, pro
gression-free survival was significantly longer in the high-dose group
(19 v 14 weeks; P = .02). Significantly more neutropenia was seen whe
n Taxol was administered as a 24-hour infusion. Response rates were si
milar in the 24- and 3-hour groups (19% and 16%, respectively; P = .6)
. No survival differences were noted. Conclusion: The 3-hour infusion
of Taxol is safe when given with premedication and is associated with
less neutropenia. There is a modest dose effect with longer time to pr
ogression at 175 mg/m(2). The observation that longer infusion produce
s more myelosuppression but does not yield higher response rates shoul
d lead to further studies to determine the optimal dose and schedule o
f this interesting new agent.