A. Cambrosio et al., NEW MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND CLINICAL-PRACTICE - A SURVEY OF LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET MONITORING, Clinical transplantation, 8(6), 1994, pp. 532-540
Background: Since its inception in the early 1980s, lymphocyte subset
(LS) monitoring of transplant patients has been a controversial techni
que. The clinical literature is replete with contradictory claims conc
erning its usefulness. No systematic information is however available
on clinicians' attitudes towards the new technology. Method. We carrie
d out a mail survey of the members of The Transplantation Society conc
erning the availability, use, value, and critical assessment of LS mon
itoring. Results. Results show that LS monitoring technology is availa
ble in most clinical settings surveyed and is regularly used by about
half of the respondents associated with a clinical transplant program.
About half of the users obtain diagnostically relevant measurements (
T4/T8 ratios), as opposed to measurements related to OKT3 anti-rejecti
on therapy. While claiming that LS measurement is a useful tool, respo
ndents attribute a low average score to the diagnostic value of the te
chnique; about 2/3 believe that its absence would not affect their cli
nical judgment. Finally, 25% of the respondents send blood for LS meas
urements although they do not believe the technique is useful. Conclus
ions. The results suggest that research instruments which generate cli
nical interest may develop clinical-diagnostic routines despite a lack
of consensus concerning their usefulness. More importantly, these rou
tines avoid a critical assessment of key notions such as ''immune moni
toring'' which tend to blur the distinction between research and thera
py.