This Comment fakes its point of departure from Myles Jackson's histori
cal study of Goethe's attempt to incite a 'protestant reformation' in
colour theory. According to Jackson, Goethe tried to unseat the remote
authority of Newton's science in favour of a science grounded in non-
specialized personal knowledge. Goethe's natural-philosophical texts,
as we shall demonstrate, involve readers in a firsthand engagement wit
h the actual experimental materials. Consequently, Goethe's physics is
presented in the form of a reflexive anthropological inquiry. When Ja
ckson proposes that Goethe respecifies Newton's optical experiments, h
e treats this as a substantive historic accomplishment Although his pa
per nicely reviews how Goethe can be understood to be respecifying New
ton's experiments, in this Comment we demonstrate the possibility of s
uch respecification both as a way of reconceptualizing an event in the
history of science, and as a distinctive mode of ethnomethodological
inquiry. In other words, we invite readers to work with the materials
of this text in order to demonstrate the possibility of a reformed exp
erimental field.