Jc. Hodge et al., RECURRENT DISK VERSUS SCAR IN THE POSTOPERATIVE-PATIENT - THE ROLE OFCOMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY (CT) DISKOGRAPHY AND CT MYELOGRAPHY, Journal of spinal disorders, 7(6), 1994, pp. 470-477
The purpose of this study was to compare computed tomography (CT)/myel
ography and CT/diskography images, in a given patient, as a method of
distinguishing postoperative fibrosis from recurrent herniated disk ma
terial. The study population consisted of 20 patients who had undergon
e lumbar diskectomy and subsequently developed recurrent radicular pai
n. All patients underwent CT/myleography and CT/diskography, each proc
edure performed within 72 h of the other. Comparison of transaxial ima
ges from CT/myelography and CT/diskography at a given disk space level
yielded the following results: in 12 patients the extradural mass see
n via CT/myelography corresponded entirely to the contrast-filled disk
fragment seen via CT/diskography (recurrent herniated disk); in three
patients the extradural mass seen via CT/myelography was larger than
the disk fragment seen via CT/diskography (recurrent herniated disk an
d fibrosis); and in five patients CT/diskography images appeared norma
l, but CT/myelography showed an extradural mass (fibrosis). Fifteen pa
tients underwent surgical reexploration with the following results: in
three of three patients, the suspicion of recurrent herniated disk an
d fibrosis by radiologic evaluation was confirmed by surgical reexplor
ation; in nine of 12 patients, solely recurrent herniated disk shown b
y radiologic criteria was similarly confirmed. The remaining five pati
ents presumed to have fibrosis by radiologic criteria were treated non
operatively.