RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF DIETS FOR MAINTAINING OBESE SUBJECTS WEIGHT AFTER MAJOR WEIGHT-LOSS - AD-LIB, LOW-FAT, HIGH-CARBOHYDRATE DIET V FIXED-ENERGY INTAKE
S. Toubro et A. Astrup, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF DIETS FOR MAINTAINING OBESE SUBJECTS WEIGHT AFTER MAJOR WEIGHT-LOSS - AD-LIB, LOW-FAT, HIGH-CARBOHYDRATE DIET V FIXED-ENERGY INTAKE, BMJ. British medical journal, 314(7073), 1997, pp. 29-34
Objectives: To compare importance of rate of initial weight loss for l
ong term outcome in obese patients and to compare efficacy of two diff
erent weight maintenance programmes. Design: Subjects were randomised
to either rapid or slow initial weight loss. Completing patients were
re-randomised to one year weight maintenance programme of ad lib diet
or fixed energy intake diet Patients were followed up one year later.
Setting: University research department in Copenhagen, Denmark. Subjec
ts: 43 (41 women) obese adults (body mass index 27-40) who were otherw
ise healthy living in or around Copenhagen. Interventions: 8 weeks of
low energy diet (2 MJ/day) or 17 weeks of conventional diet (5 MJ/day)
, both supported by an anorectic compound (ephedrine 20 mg and caffein
e 200 mg thrice daily); one year weight maintenance programme of ad li
b, low fat, high carbohydrate diet or fixed energy intake diet (less t
han or equal to 7.8 MJ/day), both with reinforcement sessions 2-3 time
s monthly. Main outcome measures: Mean initial weight loss and proport
ion of patients maintaining a weight loss of > 5 kg at follow up. Resu
lts: Mean initial weight loss was 12.6 kg (95% confidence interval 10.
9 to 14.3 kg) in rapid weight loss group and 12.6 (9.9 to 15.3) kg in
conventional diet group. Rate of initial weight loss had no effect on
weight maintenance after 6 or 12 months of weight maintenance or at fo
llow up. After weight maintenance programme, the ad lib group had main
tained 13.2 (8.1 to 18.3) kg of the initial weight loss of 13.5 (11.4
to 15.5) kg, and the fixed energy intake group had maintained 9.7 (6.1
to 13.3) kg of the initial 13.8 (11.8 to 1.7) kg weight loss (group d
ifference 3.5 (-2.4 to 9.3) kg). Regained weight at follow up was grea
ter in fixed energy intake group than in ad lib group (11.3 (7.1 to 15
.5) kg v 5.4 (2.3 to 8.6) kg, group difference 5.9 (0.7 to 11.1) kg, P
< 0.03), At follow up, 65% of ad lib group and 40% of fixed energy in
take group had maintained a weight loss of > 5 kg (P < 0.07). Conclusi
on: Ad lib, low fat, high carbohydrate diet was superior to fixed ener
gy intake for maintaining weight after a major weight loss. The rate o
f the initial weight loss did not influence long term outcome.