Apical growth is the growth habit of both filamentous streptomycetes a
nd mycelial fungi. It is also the tactic of higher plants, but only hy
phal growth is considered here. The problem of apical hyphal growth is
that the structure is only supported from its base giving little supp
ort to the continuously elongating tip. Clearly, a different strategy
is needed for the two classes of micro-organisms because the prokaryot
e has no cytoskeleton to perform mechanical work, but instead has a pa
ssive exoskeleton resisting the cell's turgor pressure; i.e. it has a
covalently cross-linked fabric covering the entire cell-the sacculus-t
hat resists the cell's turgor pressure. Conversely, the lower eukaryot
e does have a cytoskeleton, but has no totally enclosing cross-linked
fabric; rather, the hyphal wall of the eukaryotic fungi resembles fibe
rglass in that the wall is composed of fibers embedded in a plastic ph
ase that gradually sets to become more rigid. Very different models ar
e considered here for apical growth of these two classes of micro-orga
nisms. It is proposed that the prokaryotic streptomycetes carry out a
rapid turnover of the tip wall, reminiscent of the well-established in
side-to-outside growth of the side wall of bacilli. This process maint
ains the integrity of the wall during growth because an intact covalen
tly linked portion of the tip is always present. This model depends on
the ability of the murein composing the sacculus to expand elasticall
y. Two models are considered for the mycelial fungi, where the tip wal
l is enlarged by the result of fusion of vesicles. The recent model of
Bartnicki-Garcia et al. (1989, Protoplasma 153, 46-57) is critically
discussed. Their model is that the rate of addition to a particular el
ement of wall area depends on its distance from an autonomously moving
Spitzenkorper (idealized as the vesicle supply center, VSC, in the th
eoretical constructs). The three-dimensional version of their model is
also analyzed. The favored model is the ''soft spot hypothesis''; it
is based on ideas formulated more than a century ago and recently revi
ved independently by F. M. Harold, J. G. M. Wessels, and A, L. Koch fo
r different reasons. It assumes that the vesicles are fused (intussusc
epted) only if they reach points in the wall that are sufficiently new
to be still plastic. Thus newer wall will be preferentially incorpora
ted into fresh wall. This could provide a way for turgor pressure to f
acilitate the incorporation of wall materials and synthetic enzymes an
d couple elongation to the success of the organism in converting resou
rces into cytoplasm. It could also provide a way for vacuole formation
to force elongation. For the efficient and safe elongation of fungal
hyphae there may be a role for a combination of a ''vesicle supply cen
ter'' and a ''soft spot'' model to work together.