A. Uchiyama et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF DIAPHRAGMATIC ACTIVITY DURING PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION AND INTERMITTENT MANDATORY VENTILATION IN ANIMAL-MODEL, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 150(6), 1994, pp. 1564-1568
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
The aim of the present study is a comparative evaluation of the effect
s of pressure support ventilation (PSV) and intermittent mandatory ven
tilation (IMV) on diaphragmatic activity in rabbit model of neonate. T
he animals were divided into a PSV group and an IMV group. In the IMV
group, spontaneous breathing and four kinds of IMV rate (5, 10, 15, an
d 20/min) were applied (Ventilator: Bear BP200, peak inspiratory press
ure [PIP]: 12 cm H2O, inspiratory time: 0.6 s). In the PSV group, spon
taneous breathing and four levels of PSV (3, 6, 9, and 12 cm H2O) were
applied (Ventilator: VIP Bird, flow triggering). Airway pressure (Paw
), flow (V), esophageal pressure (Pes), integrated diaphragmatic elect
romyogram (Edi), and arterial gas data were measured. Amplitudes of Pe
s and Edi were expressed as percentages (%Edi and %Pes) of the control
value during spontaneous breathing to evaluate diaphragmatic activity
. Lower IMV rates did not reduce diaphragmatic activity. Approximately
half of diaphragmatic activity of control remained even at IMV 15/min
. Diaphragmatic activity disappeared at IMV20/min. In contrast, PSV re
duced Edi and Pes linearly according to support level. In conclusion,
diaphragmatic activity could be reduced more gradually with PSV than I
MV by altering ventilatory support level.