The normative assumptions and likely practical consequences of Jurgen
Habermas's communicative ethics and related conception of the public s
phere have been the topic of much critical discussion. After reviewing
some of the general features of Habermas's moral theory, I take up cr
iticisms directed at his conception of the self or moral agency, his a
ssumptions about the generalizability of human interests, and the supp
osed utopianism of his theory. In each case I argue that more charitab
le and attractive readings of his position are possible and desirable.
I conclude with some general remarks about the potential role of mass
communication media within his normative account of the public sphere
.