Rw. Beck et al., THE COURSE OF VISUAL RECOVERY AFTER OPTIC NEURITIS - EXPERIENCE OF THE OPTIC NEURITIS TREATMENT TRIAL, Ophthalmology, 101(11), 1994, pp. 1771-1778
Purpose: To define the time course of visual recovery after optic neur
itis and factors predictive of this course in the patients enrolled in
the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Methods: The cohort for this stud
y consisted of the 438 patients who completed the and month follow-up
visit. Visual acuity was measured at baseline and at seven followup vi
sits during the first 6 months. Factors predictive of recovery were ev
aluated with univariate and multivariate statistical tests. Results: V
isual recovery was rapid in all three treatment groups. In almost all
patients, regardless of treatment group and initial severity of visual
loss, improvement began within the first month. Among the 278 patient
s with baseline visual acuity of 20/ 50 or worse, all patients improve
d at least one line of visual acuity, and all except six improved at l
east three lines, during the 6-month follow-up period. Baseline visual
acuity was the best predictor of the and month visual acuity outcome
(P = 0.0001). Older age was statistically associated with a slightly w
orse outcome (P = 0.02), but this appeared to be of no clinical import
ance. Conclusions: In most patients with optic neuritis, visual recove
ry is rapid. The only factor of value in predicting the visual outcome
is initial severity of visual loss. However, even when initial loss i
s severe, visual recovery is still good in most patients. Patients not
following the usual course of visual recovery should be considered at
ypical. For such patients, further investigation in regard to etiology
of the visual loss may be appropriate.