Cs. Wilcox et al., A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY COMPARING MIANSERIN AND AMITRIPTYLINE IN MODERATELY DEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS, International clinical psychopharmacology, 9(4), 1994, pp. 271-279
We report on the results of a study comparing mianserin with amitripty
line and placebo, in outpatients with major depression (DSM-III296.2 o
r 296.3). One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized to mians
erin (n = 50), amitriptyline(n = 50) or placebo (n = 49). Medication w
as taken in a nightly (qhs) dose. During Week 1, the maximum dose was
60 mg mianserin, 120 mg amitriptyline or two placebo capsules. Beginni
ng at Day 7 (through Day 42) maximum dosages were 150 mg mianserin, 30
0 mg amitriptyline or five placebo capsules. At multiple weeks and end
point, statistically significant reductions in the Hamilton Depression
Scale (HAM-D) 17- and 21-item scores were recorded for both active dr
ugs compared with placebo. Positive results with the HAM-D were corrob
orated by other measures of efficacy. There were no statistically sign
ificant differences between mianserin and amitriptyline in terms of ef
ficacy; however, the results do suggest a more rapid therapeutic respo
nse for mianserin compared with amitriptyline, in terms of percentage
of patients showing greater than or equal to 50% improvement at Weeks
2 (30% vs 23%) and 4 (61% vs 44%). The most common adverse experiences
were somnolence (amitriptyline and mianserin 60%, placebo 31%) and dr
y mouth (amitriptyline 76%, mianserin 30% and placebo 20%). Our result
s indicate that mianserin is clearly superior to placebo, compares fav
orably with amitriptyline, and is a safe, well-tolerated, effective me
dication in the treatment of depressed outpatients.