G. Abbruzzese et al., RESPONSE OF ARM FLEXOR MUSCLES TO MAGNETIC AND ELECTRICAL BRAIN-STIMULATION DURING SHORTENING AND LENGTHENING TASKS IN MAN, Journal of physiology, 481(2), 1994, pp. 499-507
1. The responses of the brachioradialis and biceps brachii muscles to
non invasive magnetic and electrical stimulation of the human motor co
rtex have been investigated. during performance of different tasks. 2.
Both muscles were simultaneously active during elbow flexor isometric
torque or forearm flexion lifting a weight (shortening contraction),
or extension breaking the fall of the weight (lengthening contraction)
. The forearm extensor triceps brachii muscle was not engaged in any t
ask. By using different weights, comparable levels of EMG activity wer
e obtained in the same muscle across tasks. 3. Both magnetic (7 subjec
ts) and electrical (3 subjects) brain stimulation (at about 1.5 times
the motor threshold) produced larger responses during shortening, and
smaller responses during lengthening, in the brachioradialis muscle wi
th respect to isometric contractions, in spite of equal background EMG
levels. Responses evoked in the biceps brachii by either stimulation
mode were smaller during lengthening but not significantly enhanced du
ring shortening. No consistent differences in the task-related modulat
ion of the responses were present between electrical or magnetic stimu
lations. No significant changes in the evoked responses occurred durin
g passive elbow flexion or extension. 4. In three subjects, the H refl
ex was evoked in the brachioradialis by stimulation of the radial nerv
e during performance of the same tasks. The pattern of task-related mo
dulation of the reflex amplitude paralleled that obtained for brain st
imulation. 5. The opposite modulation induced by the shortening and le
ngthening tasks both in magnetically and electrically evoked motor res
ponses, and in the H reflex, suggests that task-related changes in exc
itability of the cortical neurones play a minor role. The cortical con
trol of the two different tasks might be exerted by an appropriate 'se
tting' action on the excitability of the spinal circuit, or by a chang
e in the excitability profile of the motoneuronal pool.