Kj. Mathew et al., XENON PRODUCTION CROSS-SECTIONS AT INTERMEDIATE ENERGIES AND PRODUCTION-RATES IN SMALL METEOROIDS BASED ON SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 94(4), 1994, pp. 449-474
Thin-target production cross sections of xenon isotopes from barium we
re determined at proton energies of 600 MeV, 800 MeV, 1200 MeV and 260
0 MeV using the CERN synchrocyclotron, LANL/Los Alamos and LNS/Saclay
accelerators. The data thus obtained are compared with a priori thin-t
arget production cross section calculations using code ALICE. Producti
on cross sections for the neutron induced reactions are estimated theo
retically. Together with the cross sections at low energies (less than
or equal to 45 MeV) for the p-induced reactions on barium, determined
by us earlier, the present data set provides a basis for evaluating t
he cosmogenic xenon production rates in extraterrestrial matter. Furth
er, the depth profiles for the production of stable xenon isotopes and
Xe-127 radionuclide in 5 cm, 15 cm and 25 cm artificial meteoroids, i
rradiated isotropically with 600 MeV protons, are determined experimen
tally. These measured depth profiles are compared with theoretical est
imates of the xenon production rates from barium in artificial meteoro
ids, calculated by folding depth dependent spectra of primary protons,
secondary protons and neutrons with the thin-target excitation functi
ons for the underlying proton and neutron induced reactions. The produ
ction rates thus obtained are compared with theoretical estimates usin
g the depth profiles of well studied radionuclide production in meteor
oids of various sizes. The measured xenon production ratios in the thi
ck targets isotropically irradiated with 600 MeV protons and the calcu
lated xenon production ratios in artificial meteoroids irradiated with
realistic GCR energy spectrum are compared with those deduced from me
teorite analysis and are found to be significantly different. The poss
ible reasons for the discrepancy are explored. The refinements that ar
e still necessary to accurately estimate xenon production rates in ext
raterrestrial material are discussed.