Te. Trumble et al., SYSTEMIC IMMUNE-RESPONSE TO PERIPHERAL-NERVE TRANSPLANTS ACROSS MAJORHISTOCOMPATIBILITY CLASS-I AND CLASS-II BARRIERS, Journal of orthopaedic research, 12(6), 1994, pp. 844-852
The use of peripheral nerve transplantation in limb reconstruction has
been limited by tissue rejection. In order to identify the major hist
ocompatibility antigens involved in tissue rejection, mutant strains o
f inbred mice! differing from the parent strain (C57BL/16) by either m
ajor histocompatibility complex Class I (B6.C-H2(bml) mice) or Class I
I (B6.C-H2(bml2) mice), were used in models of nerve transplantation.
One, 2, and 3 weeks after nerve or skin transplantation, the immune re
sponse in the recipient animal was monitored with use of lymphocyte-de
pendent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays. Ski
n transplants were used for comparison as the gold standard of a nonva
scularized graft with an easily observable success or failure. There w
as no significant cellular immune response by the lymphocyte-mediated
cytotoxicity assay when nerve or skin transplants involved an isolated
Class-I or Class-II mismatch, but there was a significant response 2
weeks after transplantations across a combined Class-I and Class-II ba
rrier for nerve (p < 0.04) or skin (p < 0.03). An antibody response to
the grafts occurred for both skin and nerve transplants but only when
a combined barrier was involved. This preliminary study, using a mous
e model, suggests that nerve transplantation may be performed without
systemic evidence of rejection with only a partial cross match of the
major histocompatibility complexes, thus decreasing the complexity of
tissue typing necessary for tissue banking.