Jm. Mcnamara et Ai. Houston, THE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN FORAGING OPTIONS ON INTAKE RATE AND PREDATION RATE, The American naturalist, 144(6), 1994, pp. 978-1000
We consider an animal making a single choice between options that diff
er in terms of the resulting energetic gain and probability of predati
on. We assume that the animal chooses the option that maximizes its fi
tness and investigate how the animal's energetic gain and probability
of being killed change when the environment is changed. It is shown th
at two aspects of the change strongly influence the results. One aspec
t is how the change differentially affects the foraging options. If an
improvement in the food supply has more of an effect on good than on
poor sources of food, intake rate will tend to increase. If the improv
ement has more of an effect on poor options, then intake rate may decr
ease. The other aspect is whether the change is transitory or relative
ly permanent. In a particular model, short-term changes that improve t
he environment increase intake rate, whereas long-term improvements re
sult in intake rate's remaining constant or decreasing. We discuss our
results in the context of other work on changes in foraging options a
nd attempt to give general reasons for paradoxical effects.