C. Griffin et A. Phoenix, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH - LESSONS FROM FEMINIST PSYCHOLOGY, Journal of community & applied social psychology, 4(4), 1994, pp. 287-298
The dominant methodological approach in psychological research has inv
olved the use of quantitative methods within a positivist framework. I
n this article we argue that both qualitative and quantitative methods
have their strengths and limitations, depending on the research quest
ion under investigation. We examine some of the advantages of qualitat
ive methods, paying particular attention to the value of such methods
for feminist researchers. We challenge the positivist assumption that
all research should be apolitical and value-free, arguing that the pol
itical context in which all research studies take place plays an impor
tant role in decisions about the appropriate research methods to use.
Despite the value attached to qualitative methods by feminist research
ers, there may be projects for which quantitative methods, or a combin
ation of qualitative and quantitative techniques, are more suitable. W
e draw on examples from our research on the transition from school to
the job market for young people, and a study of 16- to 19-year-old fir
st time mothers to illustrate these points, examining the practical im
plications of our arguments for applied social psychology research.