Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare and explain the stati
stical methods employed to evaluate the in vitro sealing efficiency of
adhesive restorative systems. Methods. Two hundred and sixty sound fr
eshly extracted human premolars were randomly divided into 13 groups.
Standardized cavities were prepared, and the teeth were restored with
13 restorative systems. The teeth were thermocycled, immersed in dye,
embedded in resin and sectioned. Five evaluation criteria were recorde
d: mean, median and mode of the data measured on each tooth, maximum d
ye penetration measurements on each tooth, and percentage of teeth in
each group without any dye penetration. For each parameter, one-way AN
OVAs and Duncan a posteriori tests were used to compare the 13 systems
. Results. The number of non-statistically different subgroups, pointe
d out by Duncan tests, was greater when the selected criterion was the
maximum dye penetration (6 subgroups) or the percentage of teeth with
out any penetration (5 subgroups) than when the criterion was the medi
an (3 subgroups), the made or the mean (4 subgroups). The positioning
of the 13 adhesive restorative systems established from the five crite
ria was different. Equivalent adhesion strategies revealing different
experimental results indicate that other factors contribute to the fin
al effectiveness of a particular system: clinical approach with respec
t to the formation of an elastic bonding layer, and shrinkage, physica
l and rheological properties of resin composite. Significance: The res
ults of these in vitro studies of dye penetration must be considered a
s comparisons and not as absolute conclusions. The maximum dye penetra
tion measured on each tooth, which complies with the aim of the in vit
ro evaluation of sealing efficiency defined by Pashley (1990) and allo
ws powerful statistical analysis of results, seems to be the best eval
uation criterion.