PETROGENETIC MODELING AND STABLE ISOTOPIC EVALUATION OF ANORTHOSITIC AND JOTUNITIC TO SYENITIC MAGMA SERIES IN THE SAN-GABRIEL ANORTHOSITE COMPLEX, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
H. Ekstrom et al., PETROGENETIC MODELING AND STABLE ISOTOPIC EVALUATION OF ANORTHOSITIC AND JOTUNITIC TO SYENITIC MAGMA SERIES IN THE SAN-GABRIEL ANORTHOSITE COMPLEX, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Precambrian research, 70(1-2), 1994, pp. 1-24
Two magmatic series have been recognized in the 1.12 Ga San Gabriel an
orthosite-syenite complex in the western San Gabriel Mountains of sout
hern California: one anorthositic and the other jotunitic to syenitic.
The anorthosite series consists of anorthosite (avg. similar to An(48
)), gabbroic anorthosite, and gabbro. Anorthositic rocks are bordered
on their southern and western margins by a mafic jotunite-syenite seri
es that forms slightly curved trends on Harker variation diagrams. Vol
umetrically minor ultramafite occurs as dikes and sheets that are high
ly enriched in Fe, Ti, and P and have geochemical signatures suggestin
g affinity with the jotunite-syenite series. Although high-grade regio
nal metamorphism has not affected the complex, it has experienced post
-emplacement deformation and most rocks exhibit variable hydrothermal
alteration. Alteration includes extensive sericitization in the anorth
osite rocks and near-complete replacement of primary pyroxene by actin
olitic aggregates in all rock units. Oxygen isotopic fractionations be
tween coexisting secondary calcite and host feldspar indicate disequil
ibrium. It is concluded that delta(18)O values of primary minerals ai-
e not far-shifted from magmatic values, and that the effects of hydrot
hermal alteration were generally localized. Moreover, the alteration h
as not affected the elemental composition of the two Series allowing t
heir use in evaluation of magmatic evolution. The anorthosite series a
nd the jotunite-syenite series are modeled both as (1) comagmatic and
descending from a broadly dioritic parent, and (2) as non-comagmatic a
nd descending from a gabbroic anorthosite parent for the anorthosite s
eries and from a jotunitic parent for the jotunite-syenite series. In
both cases, rocks of the anorthosite series are considered to be entir
ely cumulate in origin. In the jotunite-syenite series, ultramafite is
regarded as an early-formed, sorted cumulate similar in composition t
o mafic jotunite but lacking feldspar, and strongly layered mafic jotu
nite is also regarded as a cumulate. Felsic jotunite and syenite may m
ore closely approximate magmas, but the small variation in Mg number s
uggests that crystal sorting may be responsible for much of the compos
itional variation in the series. High K, Ba, Rb and Eu/Eu in some sye
nite may indicate accumulation of potassium feldspar in these rocks. D
uring anorthosite crystallization, magmas are envisioned to follow an
SiO2-depletion, Fe-enrichment trend that is reversed by the crystalliz
ation of mafic jotunite in the comagmatic case, but may eventually res
ult in the formation of ore bodies in the non-comagmatic model. Major-
element models are applied successfully for both hypotheses; however,
the REE data cannot be successfully modeled in the comagmatic case, po
ssibly due to the strong effect of apatite and uncertainty in apatite
partition coefficients. Although the unconstrained choice of parent ma
gma(s) composition is a deficiency in both models, the failure of the
comagmatic model to describe REE variations is not related to choice o
f parent magma composition. The non-comagmatic model to describe REE v
ariations is not related to choice of parent magma composition. The no
n-comagmatic model can best explain all compositional variations, larg
ely as a result of the additional freedom of choice of parent magma co
mposition. In addition, the limited spatial occurrence of the jotunite
-syenite unit and the lack of jotunite dikes in the complex may suppor
t the intrusion of jotunite-syenite along the anorthosite-country rock
contact as a pluton after, or possibly during, the final stages of an
orthosite crystallization. On the basis of geochemical modeling and fi
eld relations, we favor the crystallization of the two magma series as
non-comagmatic with anorthositic rocks forming as cumulates from a ga
bbroic anorthosite parent magma and ultramafite, jotunite, and syenite
forming from a jotunitic parent magma.