G. Davies et al., EFFECT OF NONATTENDERS ON THE POTENTIAL OF A PRIMARY-CARE PROGRAM TO REDUCE CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN THE POPULATION, BMJ. British medical journal, 309(6968), 1994, pp. 1553-1556
Objectives-To determine the feasibility of enrolling non-attenders of
a population based cardiovascular risk reduction programme (the Britis
h family heart study) into a further, similar programme and to assess
the effect of non-attendance on the effectiveness of the programme. De
sign-Follow up of non-attenders by practice nurses, including home vis
its if necessary, to administer questionnaires and obtain physiologica
l measurements. Setting-Eight general practices across England, Scotla
nd, and Wales. Subjects-Non-attenders in a cardiovascular risk factor
screening and intervention programme compared with attenders. Main out
come measures-Number of nonattenders enrolled; sociodemographic charac
teristics; personal and family history of coronary heart disease; card
iovascular risk factors; and total coronary risk score. Results-Data w
ere collected from 106 (17%) of the 608 non-attending families (99 men
and 42 women). Of the 543 non-attending families from five practices
that attempted complete follow up, 256 had moved away or died. Only 76
were eventually enrolled into the study. The prevalence of coronary h
eart disease and a family history of coronary heart disease were simil
ar among non-attenders and attenders as were the individual coronary r
isk factors studied except smoking. Women non-attenders were more like
ly to be current cigarette smokers than attenders (15/42 v 202/948, P
= 0.02). Conclusions-The intensive follow up of nonattenders resulted
in real intervention opportunities in only a small number. Since the e
ffect of any intervention in a population is reduced by nonattendance
audit of preventive medical programmes aimed at the population should
allow for the effect of non-attenders on the overall results.