This paper presents a framework for analyzing the costs and benefits o
f internal versus external capital allocation. We focus primarily on c
omparing an internal capital market with bank lending. While both repr
esent centralized forms of financing, in the former case the financing
is owner-provided, while in the latter case it is not. We argue that
the ownership aspect of internal capital allocation has three importan
t consequences: (1) it leads to more monitoring than bank lending; (2)
it reduces managers' entrepreneurial incentives; and (3) it makes it
easier to efficiently redeploy the assets of projects that are perform
ing poorly under existing management.