Ir. Swingland, THE ECOLOGY OF STABILITY IN SOUTHEAST-ASIA FORESTS - BIODIVERSITY ANDCOMMON RESOURCE PROPERTY, Global ecology and biogeography letters, 3(4-6), 1993, pp. 290-296
It is clear that for decades the traditional, confrontational method o
f dealing with conflicts in interests over natural resources does not
resolve problems. Most methods rely on one party or another fulfilling
undertakings which can easily be broken without any framework of chec
ks and balances which ensure consistency and homeostasis. At least two
difficulties exist to providing a better basis for resolving conflict
; some jurisprudence framework derived from natural sciences and socio
economics concerning common resource property, and a clearer understan
ding of the definition of biodiversity. The absence of a decision-maki
ng environmental framework for resolving conflicts between environment
al 'stakeholders', benefitting all parties, means that any conservatio
n or sustainable use of natural resources will always be corrupted and
fail. Moreover the way in which biodiversity is defined changes plann
ing priorities. This chapter offers an insight into both the problems
and possible solutions of biodiversity management, or conservation, an
d common resource property disputes.