Tl. Ernst et al., EVALUATION OF US EPA ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS(EMAP)-WETLANDS SAMPLING DESIGN AND CLASSIFICATION, Environmental management, 19(1), 1995, pp. 99-113
The United States Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Moni
toring and Assessment Program (EMAP) will monitor the nation's resourc
es by evaluating the status and trends of selected indicators of condi
tion using a probability-based sampling design. The EMAP-Wetlands prog
ram will monitor the condition of the nation's wetlands. The EMAP clas
sification system is an aggregation of the many subclasses of the US F
ish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) classific
ation system. This aggregation results in fewer wetland classes with m
ore wetlands per class than the NWI system. Aggregation of the NWI cla
ssification was based primarily on dominant vegetation cover, flooding
regimes, dominant water source, and adjacency to rivers and lakes. We
evaluated the EMAP classification system and sampling design using NW
I digital wetlands data for portions of Illinois, Washington, North Da
kota, and South Dakota. Relative numbers of wetlands, total areas, ave
rage areas, and common versus rare classes were compared between the E
MAP and NWI classification systems. As expected, the EMAP classificati
on provided fewer wetland polygons, each with larger areas, without al
tering total wetland area. Summary statistics comparing sample estimat
es to true population parameters (represented by the NWI data) demonst
rated the effectiveness of the EMAP sampling design with the exception
of rare EMAP classes in the selected regions. Although simple random
sampling is inadequate for both targe and small wetlands, the EMAP sam
pling design is readily adapted to provide better estimates for these
categories. Aggregating the NWI classification to the EMAP classificat
ion provides fewer wetland classes, with more wetlands per class, for
EMAP's annual reports and statistical summaries.