We reviewed our experience with 145 posterior urethral strictures and
disruptions complicating pelvic fracture urethral injury during 17 yea
rs. Stricture was corrected by optical urethrotomy in 12 cases, urethr
oscrotal inlay in 23, perineal anastomotic urethroplasty in 78 and tra
nspubic urethroplasty in 32. Results were almost always successful aft
er anastomotic urethroplasty, whether performed by the perineal (95%)
or transpubic (97%) route. Therefore, this procedure deserves to be re
garded as the gold standard for the treatment of posttraumatic posteri
or urethral strictures and disruptions. Urethral anastomosis should be
attempted first through the perineum in every case, with the transpub
ic procedure done only when a tension-free bulbo-prostatic anastomosis
could not be accomplished from below the stricture. Optical urethroto
my was successful (58%) in patients with mild strictures and a persist
ent opening between the bulbar and prostatic areas of the intact ureth
ra. Therefore, this procedure should be reserved for such cases. Repea
ted urethrotomy of a long fibrous segment between a widely distracted
prostatic and bulbar urethra would not only have a poor result but, by
jeopardizing the elasticity of the anterior urethra, it also may unde
rmine the chance for subsequent anastomotic urethroplasty. A urethrosc
rotal inlay procedure is doomed to failure in 57% of the cases and (wi
th other substitution procedures) it should be restricted to stricture
s involving extensive segments of the posterior and/or anterior urethr
a. Sexual impotence usually (15%) resulted from the original pelvic fr
acture urethral injury and rarely (2.5%) from the urethroplasty itself
.