Six commercial phagostimulants (Coax, Entice,:Gusto, Konsume, Mo-Bait,
and Pheast) at the lowest recommended field rates were compared to de
ionized water and 5% source (wt:vol) in water relative to proboscis ex
tension response, feeding time and feeding volume of 1-, 2-, and 3-d-o
ld unfed laboratory-reared male and female adult corn earworms, Helico
verpa tea (Boddie). The percentage of 1-d-old females and males showin
g a positive proboscis extension response upon tarsal contact was sign
ificantly higher for 5% sucrose than for the other treatments which we
re not significantly different. There were no significant differences
in the percentages of positive proboscis extension response of 2-d-old
females and males to all treatments or to 5% sucrose after initial ex
posure to the phagostimulants and water, indicating an increase in res
ponsiveness as nonspecific hunger or thirst increased. With few except
ions, notably the 3-d-old females for feeding time, and no exceptions
for feeding volume, no significant differences were observed between t
he response to commercial phagostimulants and deionized water alone; b
ut responses to all these treatments were significantly lower than res
ponses to 5% sucrose. Feeding time and feeding volume of the same moth
s on 5% sucrose after initial feeding on the commercial phagostimulant
s and water were considerable. Overall, these results indicate that th
e commercial phagostimulants are not effective feeding stimulants at t
he rates evaluated for adult H. tea when compared with 5% sucrose beca
use the feeding response was equal to that of water alone. Some implic
ations of the results relative to the use of feeding stimulants in adu
lt H. tea control are discussed.