The study is an analysis of the tools of rhetorical seduction. Through
a case study of one demagogue, David Duke, it attempts to illuminate
not only the ways in which arguments are constructed but the way in wh
ich the argumentative climate can be manipulated for maximum message e
ffect. The analysis therefore broadens the scope of traditional argume
ntative studies. It considers not only the power of the arguments but
also the ways in which rhetors can bring maximum force to bear in esta
blishing the rheotorical ground on which future debates will be waged.