ACCURACY OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION VERSUS COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN DETECTING OCCULT LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ORAL EPIDERMOID CARCINOMA

Citation
Sa. Bergman et al., ACCURACY OF CLINICAL EXAMINATION VERSUS COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN DETECTING OCCULT LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ORAL EPIDERMOID CARCINOMA, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 52(12), 1994, pp. 1236-1239
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
02782391
Volume
52
Issue
12
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1236 - 1239
Database
ISI
SICI code
0278-2391(1994)52:12<1236:AOCEVC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of clinical examination versus comp uted tomography (CT) scanning in detecting positive cervical lymph nod es (N) in patients with epidermoid carcinomas of the oral cavity, 27 p atients with epidermoid carcinomas were reviewed. Patients and Methods : The patients underwent 40 neck dissections, 20 with N- and 20 with N + necks histologically. All patients were examined by the same clinici an, and all CT scans were read by the same radiologist. Patients with clinical and CT N- necks underwent neck dissection only if the neck ha d to be entered to resect the primary tumor or if the primary tumor wa s T3 or T4 with a high probability of microscopic metastasis. Results: Of the 20 necks that were histologically N-, 16 (80%) were clinically diagnosed as N- and 4 (20%) N+ versus 18 (90%) N- and 2 (10%) N+ diag nosed by CT scan. Of the 20 histologically N+ necks, 12 (60%) were cli nically diagnosed as N+ and 8 (40%) N- versus 11 (55%) N+ and 9 (45%) N- diagnosed by CT scan. All lymph nodes diagnosed as N- by both clini cal examination and CT scan were less than 1 cm in diameter. Overall, clinical examination of the neck was correct in 28 patients (70%) and the CT scan was correct in 29 patients (73%). Both clinical examinatio n and CT scan were more accurate in diagnosis of N- necks. In 31 necks (78%), the CT and clinical examination were in agreement. Of these, 1 0 of 10 (100%) were correctly positive. Of the 21 in which both were n egative, 14 were histologically N-, and 14 (67%) were correct. Overall , in those cases in which both CT and clinical examination were in agr eement, the diagnosis was correct in 24 of 31 (77%). Conclusion: These results suggest that there is no significant difference in the accura cy of clinical examination versus CT scanning in detecting both positi ve and negative cervical nodes. When both CT and clinical examination agree, positive cervical nodes are almost always correctly diagnosed. However, one third of the negative cervical nodes were incorrectly dia gnosed. Improved methods for detecting occult disease are still needed .