Explanations of the growth of scientific knowledge can be characterize
d in terms of logical, cognitive, and social schemas. But cognitive an
d social schemas are complementary rather than competitive, and purely
social explanations of scientific change are as inadequate as purely
cognitive explanations. For example, cognitive explanations of the che
mical revolution must be supplemented by and combined with social expl
anations, and social explanations of the rise of the mechanical worldv
iew must be supplemented by and combined with cognitive explanations.
Rational appraisal of cognitive and social strategies for improving kn
owledge should appreciate the interdependence of mind and society.