L. Doyal et P. Henning, STOPPING TREATMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL-FAILURE - THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS, Pediatric nephrology, 8(6), 1994, pp. 768-771
Dialysis and transplantation have been of obvious benefit to children
with renal failure, Yet this is not always so. End-stage treatment can
also create physical and mental suffering, for both patients and thei
r families. For this reason, the availability of life-saving treatment
creates difficult ethical and legal dilemmas concerning when it can m
orally and lawfully be rejected. These dilemmas are explored through a
general account of the doctrine of informed consent and its applicati
on to the refusal of such therapy. Clinical and parental duties of car
e are outlined for young and adolescent children. For young children,
the rights of parents are evaluated, recognising the significance of p
arental involvement and support for treatment for renal failure to be
successful. It is further argued that adolescents who are deemed to be
competent to give informed consent have the moral right to choose to
die rather than to continue treatment, To minimise this prospect, the
importance of effective counselling and peer group support is made cle
ar, along with a partnership model of clinical negotiation.