Sm. Hammer et al., ISSUES IN COMBINATION ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY - A REVIEW, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes, 7, 1994, pp. 190000024-190000037
High viral burden and replication persist during all phases of human i
mmunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. Although monotherapy has yielded
considerable benefits, these benefits are neither absolute nor durable
. Combination therapy has multiple goals: to reduce Viral replication
and burden; to relieve drug toxicity; to attenuate viral mutations lea
ding to resistance and possibly to conversion from non-syncytium-induc
ing to syncytium-inducing virus; and to broaden the spectrum of specif
ic cells and tissues in which antiretroviral agents are active. At pre
sent, zidovudine remains the cornerstone of antiretroviral monotherapy
and combination therapy. A partial list of agents tried in combinatio
ns with and without zidovudine includes the nucleoside analogues zalci
tabine and didanosine; non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors
(nevirapine, delavirdine, atevirdine, pyridinones, TIBO derivatives);
protease inhibitors; inhibitors of viral regulatory functions (tat in
hibitors); cy tokine antagonists; acyclovir; and colony-stimulating fa
ctors. The rationales, the regimens, and the results all vary. We usua
lly recommend combination therapy for treatment-naive patients who are
asymptomatic with <200 CD4(+) cells/mm(3) or who are symptomatic, and
for patients who have been receiving zidovudine monotherapy and who a
re stable but whose CD4(+) counts have fallen to <300 cells/mm(3), or
who are progressing. In the absence of definitive results from clinica
l trials of combination therapy, the decision to embark on this route
remains to be made between each individual patient and the practitione
r.