Objectives. This paper investigates whether a particular time point ca
n be recommended as the standard definition for long-term survival (LT
S) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Design. A review of the literatur
e specifically referring to long-term survival in SCLC in the title. I
ndividual and updated survival data from 2196 patients entered into si
x Medical Research Council (MRC) SCLC randomised trials to investigate
changes in the hazard, or risk of death, over time. Examination of su
bgroups to identify different hazard patterns. Setting. World-wide lit
erature and patients recruited to SCLC trials conducted by the MRC Lun
g Cancer Working Party (LCWP). Subjects. Papers accessed through compu
terised literature and hand searches and 2196 patients from six random
ised clinical trials in SCLC conducted by the MRC LCWP. Results. In al
l, 111 publications were identified by the literature searches. Althou
gh the majority defined LTS as 2 years, the definitions ranged from 18
months to greater than 5 years. There thus appears to be no agreed st
andard definition. The daily hazard was plotted for the large series o
f patients entered into the MRC LCWP SCLC trials to observe any patter
ns of change. There was an approximately constant daily hazard of 0.00
35 during the first 2 years from randomisation, and following a transi
tional period, there was a further approximately constant, but smaller
, daily hazard of 0.00035 from 3 years onwards. When subgroups of pati
ents were examined this transition to a lower risk was observed in pat
ients with limited disease, but patients with extensive disease remain
ed at a high constant hazard throughout. It is suggested that 3 years
should be adopted as the standard definition of LTS in SCLC, and that
studies should always report limited and extensive stage patients sepa
rately.