Gj. Pierce et al., DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF THE FISHED POPULATION OF LOLIGO-FORBESIIN UK WATERS - ANALYSIS OF FISHERY DATA, Fisheries research, 21(1-2), 1994, pp. 193-216
UK fisheries for the squid Loligo forbesi are described, based mainly
on analysis of fishery statistical data (1980-1990) held in the Scotti
sh Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department (SOAFD) and Ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) databases, and synthesis of pu
blished and unpublished information from various sources including int
erviews with Scottish fishermen. The weight and value of squid landing
s in the UK have increased substantially during the last decade, parti
cularly in Scotland. While squid landed in Scotland are thought to con
sist almost exclusively of Loligo forbesi, landings in England and Wal
es may contain a significant proportion of Loligo vulgaris. Squid are
landed primarily as a by catch of trawling and seining finfish fisheri
es although some directed fishing takes place, particularly at Rockall
. There is limited use of jigs, although most reported trials of jiggi
ng gear have been unsuccessful. Squid are caught throughout UK waters,
although the most important fishing areas vary from year to year. Sco
ttish landings come from all around the coast of Scotland, particularl
y the Moray Firth, as well as from Rockall and (historically) Faroe Ba
nk. Landings from Rockall are apparently unpredictable, with large amo
unts of squid being caught in 1986, 1987 and 1989 but almost none duri
ng the rest of the decade. Squid landed in England and Wales are also
taken from a wide area, including the English Channel, Celtic Sea, Roc
kall, and (historically) the Bay of Biscay. Records of Scottish landin
gs from 1904 suggest the existence of a 15 year cycle of abundance. Th
e seasonal pattern of landings in Scotland shows a predictable seasona
l pattern, with most landings from coastal waters occurring in October
and November and most landings from Rockall in June and August. Resul
ts of correlation analyses of landings, fishing effort and CPUE data a
re generally consistent with a by-catch fishery on a patchily distribu
ted resource, suggesting that CPUE is a reasonable index of abundance
except for areas such as Rockall where there is a significant proporti
on of directed fishing. UK squid stocks are currently neither assessed
nor managed, and the status of squid as primarily a by-catch preclude
s most management options. However, given the relatively high quality
of data routinely collected, and assuming implementation of checks on
species identification and compilation of data at least weekly, stock
assessment should be possible.