P. Gouny et al., DISTAL BYPASS FOR LIMB SALVAGE - COMPARATIVE-STUDY IN PATIENTS BELOW AND ABOVE 80 YEARS OF AGE, Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 35(5), 1994, pp. 419-424
Revascularization for chronic lower extremity ischemia in patients of
80 years and older is controversial. To better define operative risk a
nd outcome after peripheral vascular procedures in the elderly, our ex
perience from January 1990 to December 1992 was reviewed, We compared
two groups of patients: group I with 26 patients (28 revascularization
s) 80 years of age and older (84 +/- 3 years) and group II with 29 pat
ients (32 revascularizations) younger than 80 years (70 +/- 8 year), T
he two groups were similar with regard to risk factors, surgical indic
ation (rest pain and/or gangrene) and type of graft (in situ vein: 35,
reversed vein: 12, PTFE: 13). Fourteen femoro-popliteal bypasses, 17
femoro-tibial bypasses (8 to the anterior tibial artery and 3 to the p
osterior tibial artery) and 29 femoro-peroneal bypasses were performed
, The operative mortality rate was 11.5% in group I and 6.9% in group
II. The cumulative life-table survival rate at 24 months was 39.5% in
group I and 55% in group II. Primary patency rate at 24 months was 64%
in group I and 67% in group II. Secondary patency rate at 24 months w
as 74.5% in group I and 73% in group II, Limb salvage at 24 months was
80% in group I and 83% in group II. Comparison of the older and young
er groups showed no statistically significant difference in mortality
rate, graft patency and limb salvage, Operative mortality and graft pa
tency were not different with regard to age of patients.