MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL PROTEINS ARE REQUIRED FOR BOTH TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION AND NEGATIVE AUTOREGULATION OF CAULOBACTER-CRESCENTUS FLAGELLAR GENES

Citation
G. Ramakrishnan et al., MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL PROTEINS ARE REQUIRED FOR BOTH TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION AND NEGATIVE AUTOREGULATION OF CAULOBACTER-CRESCENTUS FLAGELLAR GENES, Journal of bacteriology, 176(24), 1994, pp. 7587-7600
Citations number
75
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00219193
Volume
176
Issue
24
Year of publication
1994
Pages
7587 - 7600
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9193(1994)176:24<7587:MSPARF>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The periodic and sequential expression of flagellar (fla) genes in the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle depends on their organization into levels I to IV of a regulatory hierarchy in which genes at the top of the hierarchy are expressed early in the cell cycle and are required f or the later expression of genes below them. In these studies, we have examined the regulatory role of level II fliF operon, which is locate d near the top of the hierarchy. The last gene in the fliF operon, flb D, encodes a transcriptional factor required for activation of sigma(5 4)-dependent promoters at levels III and IV and negative autoregulatio n of the level II fliF promoter. We have physically mapped the fliF op eron, identified four new genes in the transcription unit, and determi ned that the organization of these genes is 5'-fliF-fliG-flbE-fliN-flb D-3'. Three of the genes encode homologs of the MS ring protein (FliF) and two switch proteins (FliG and FliN) of enteric bacteria, and the fourth encodes a predicted protein (FlbE) without obvious similarities to known bacterial proteins. We have introduced nonpolar mutations in each of the open reading frames and shown that all of the newly ident ified genes (fliF, fliG, flbE, and fliN) are required in addition flbD for activation of the sigma(54)-dependent flgK and flbG promoters at level III. In contrast, fliF, fliG, and flbE, but not fliN, are requir ed in addition flbD for negative autoregulation of the level II fliF p romoter. The simplest interpretation of these results is that the requ irements of FlbD in transcriptional activation and repression are not identical, and we speculate that FlbD function is subject to dual or o verlapping controls. We also discuss the requirement of multiple struc tural genes for regulation of levels II and III genes and suggest that fla gene expression in C. crescentus mag be coupled to two checkpoint s in flagellum assembly.