This paper analyzes the role that political corruption played in banki
ng crises in two states, Rhode Island and Maryland, where, in the 1980
s and 1990s, private deposit insurance funds collapsed and state gover
nments were forced to intervene to bail out member institutions. The a
rgument is made that the collapse of these funds was not the result of
abstract economic forces but rather was the outcome of structural wea
knesses in the two banking systems, weaknesses that ultimately derived
from close relationships and overlapping interests among bankers, pol
iticians and regulators. These structural weaknesses are examined and
the implications of these two case studies for private deposit insuran
ce and self-regulation among financial institutions are considered.