Jp. Carpenter et al., PERIPHERAL VASCULAR-SURGERY WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AS THE SOLE PREOPERATIVE IMAGING MODALITY, Journal of vascular surgery, 20(6), 1994, pp. 861-871
Purpose: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a developing techniqu
e that provides arteriograms without the risks associated with iodinat
ed contrast and arterial puncture or the expense of hospitalization. p
rior reports have demonstrated the accuracy of peripheral vessel MRA f
or evaluation of the aorta through pedal vessels. This study sought to
determine whether vascular reconstructions could be planned and accom
plished on the basis of MRA alone. Methods: Eighty consecutive candida
tes for bypass with ischemic rest pain or tissue loss were studied wit
h preoperative outpatient MRA of the juxtarenal aorta through the foot
. Confirmation of MRA findings was provided by intraoperative intraart
erial pressure measurements for proximal vessels and postbypass arteri
ography for the runoff. Life-table analysis of graft patency and limb
salvage was performed. Results: Two patients could not tolerate MRA an
d required contrast arteriography, but all others underwent reconstruc
tive procedures on the basis of MRA alone (11 aortobifemoral, 67 infra
inguinal). Intraoperative findings regarding suitability of inflow and
outflow vessels confirmed the accuracy of the MRAs in every case. MRA
indicated that none of the patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass h
ad significant inflow occlusive disease, and this was confirmed at ope
ration with pressure measurements of inflow vessels that were always w
ithin 10 mm Hg (peak systolic) of systemic pressure. The results of in
traoperative completion arteriography and preoperative MRAs were ident
ical for ah but two patients who had minor discrepancies. All aortobif
emoral reconstructions remained patent, and all limbs remained intact.
The infrainguinal reconstructions had an 84% limb salvage rate and 78
% primary graft patency rate at 21 months. Comparison of charges for p
atients undergoing preoperative MRA versus contrast angiography showed
a cost savings of $1288 for each patient treated with preoperative MR
A alone. Conclusions: MRA is a noninvasive, cost-effective outpatient
imaging technique that, if properly performed and interpreted, is suff
icient for planning peripheral bypass procedures. Its use may supplant
contrast arteriography in many patients.