El. Chan et al., THE USE OF A CONFIRMATORY ASSAY TO INCREASE THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE CHLAMYDIAZYME TEST, American journal of clinical pathology, 102(6), 1994, pp. 724-728
The blocking assay was used to reexamine 15,662 patient specimens (2,5
65 male specimens, 13,097 female specimens) that were submitted for Ch
lamydia detection using the Chlamydiazyme EIA assay (Abbott Laboratori
es, North Chicago, IL). Specimens that gave optical density (OD) readi
ngs between 1.99 to cutoff and between cutoff to 3 times the negative
control in the Chlamydiazyme EIA assay were analyzed further by the bl
ocking assay during the phase 1 study. In the phase 2 study, another 1
,120 specimens (473 male specimens and 647 female specimens) that had
the above mentioned OD range in the Chlamydiazyme assay were tested wi
th the blocking assay and the direct fluorescent antibody test using t
he cytospin method. Significant finding from phase 1 study demonstrate
d that 42.3% of the male specimens with optical density between cutoff
to three times the negative control can be blocked by blocking assay
(confirmed positive), whereas only 50% of the female specimens with OD
range between cutoff to .5 were blocked by the blocking assay. In the
phase 2 study, similar results were obtained with the blocking assay.
The direct fluorescent antibody test showed excellent correlation wit
h the blocking assay. These data showed that both blocking or direct f
luorescent antibody tests can be used for confirmation purposes to inc
rease the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. However, for speci
mens with OD values below the cutoff to 3 times the negative control,
it was necessary to reassess the specimens by either of the methods. T
his was true especially with the male specimens.