In a study designed to investigate possible mechanisms involved in pre
viously identified gender differences in memory for sexual material, s
ubjects read an erotic paragraph one sentence at a time. We then obtai
ned reading times for each sentence. Reading times were longest for er
otic sentences; romantic and neutral sentences did not differ signific
antly from each other. Subjects' scores on the erotophobia-erotophilia
dimension were correlated with reading time. In an unexpected finding
, those subjects with higher erotophobic scores read all categories of
sentences more slowly. Recognition memory performance was not predict
ed by reading time. Female subjects yielded better recognition accurac
y than male subjects did, although males were more accurate at recogni
zing erotic sentences. The results of the study suggest that reading e
rotic material generates processes, perhaps emotional in nature, not s
een in nonsexual material.