TERMINATION OF EARLY-PREGNANCY BY 2 REGIMENS OF MIFEPRISTONE WITH MISOPROSTOL AND MIFEPRISTONE WITH PG05 - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL IN CHINA
Gw. Sang et al., TERMINATION OF EARLY-PREGNANCY BY 2 REGIMENS OF MIFEPRISTONE WITH MISOPROSTOL AND MIFEPRISTONE WITH PG05 - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL IN CHINA, Contraception, 50(6), 1994, pp. 501-510
A multicentre randomized open clinical trial was conducted to compare
the efficacy and side effects of two regimens of mifepristone with mis
oprostol, and mifepristone with PG05 for termination of early pregnanc
y (amenorrhoea < = 49 days). Six-hundred women in early pregnancy, who
requested medical abortion were randomly allocated into 3 groups. in
group 1 (n = 301), an initial dose of mifepristone 50 mg was given, fo
llowed by 25 mg every 12 hours up to a total doss of 150 mg mifepristo
ne, plus a single oral dose of misoprostol 600 mu g in the morning of
the third day. In group 2 (n = 150), the same regimen of mifepristone
was given, but dl-15-methyl PGF(2 alpha) (PG05) 1 mg vaginal supposito
ry was inserted on the third day. In group 3 (n = 149), a single dose
of mifepristone 200 mg was given and misoprostol 600 mu g was used as
in group 1. The complete abortion rate were 94.4%, 97.3%, and 94.6% fo
r group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. 3.0, 2.0 and 2.7% of women had incom
plete abortion, and 1.7, 0.7 and 2.0% of women in the 3 groups were tr
eatment failures; in the remaining 1% in group 1 and 0.7% in group 3,
treatment outcome could not be determined, There were no significant d
ifferences among the 3 groups. Lower abdominal pain was the main compl
aint which was reported by 82% of the subjects after PGs administratio
n. The incidence of diarrhoea in PG05 group (38.7%) was significantly
higher than that in the other two groups (21.6 and 20.1%) (P<0.001), a
nd so was vomiting. It was concluded that misoprostol, as an orally ef
fective prostaglandin, in combination with mifepristone for induced ab
ortion of early pregnancy was as effective as PG05 vaginal suppository
. Besides, it has advantages of convenience of use, less side effects,
easy storage and transfer, and low cost.