Pt. Simonian et al., BIOMECHANICAL SIMULATION OF THE ANTEROPOSTERIOR COMPRESSION INJURY OFTHE PELVIS - AN UNDERSTANDING OF INSTABILITY AND FIXATION, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (309), 1994, pp. 245-256
Seven fresh cadaveric pelvic specimens were biomechanically analyzed.
Testing was first performed on intact pelves and then after progressiv
e disruption of the (1) symphysis pubis, (2) unilateral anterior and i
nterosseous sacroiliac ligaments and capsule, (3) ipsilateral sacrospi
nous and sacrotuberous ligaments; and fixation with a 4.5-mm narrow dy
namic compression plate at the symphysis pubis, or a 4.5-mm narrow dyn
amic compression plate at the anterior sacroiliac joint with and witho
ut the symphysis pubis plate, or a 7.0-mm sacroiliac lag screw anchore
d into the S1 vertebral body with and without the symphysis pubis plat
e. Symphyseal gapping occurred after isolated symphysis pubis disrupti
on. With additional disruption of the unilateral sacroiliac joint liga
ments, symphysis pubis displacement was unaffected; however, the injur
ed sacroiliac joint gap displacement, and sacroiliac joint flexion ang
ulation on both intact and injured sides increased as compared to the
specimen in the intact state. Further disruption of the ipsilateral sa
crotuberous and sacrospinous ligament complex produced little addition
al motion at either symphysis pubis or sacroiliac joints. Plate fixati
on of the symphysis pubis alone reduced symphysis pubis motion, but no
t sacroiliac motion. Use of sacroiliac fixation alone without a symphy
sis pubis plate did not affect symphysis pubis motion. The symphysis p
ubis plate is the key to stabilizing symphysis pubis motion, and simil
arly, sacroiliac joint fixation is required to control sacroiliac join
t motion. Both single iliosacral screws and plates produced equivalent
decreases in sacroiliac joint motion.