The clinical performance of GS-80 and Lojic + amalgam alloys was compa
red with that of Dispersalloy, Valiant PhD, Lojic N and Permite C amal
gam alloys over periods of up to three years. The 1114 restorations we
re placed by one dentist in 23 canine, 418 premolar and 673 molar perm
anent teeth of 301 adult patients treated in a private practice. Direc
t and indirect clinical assessments were made of the restorations for
failures (there were no true failures), and for the deterioration of f
our clinical factors. All restorations were rated as being either 'goo
d' (A) or 'adequate' (B) for each of the four factors which, apart fro
m surface texture, showed some slight but statistically-significant cl
inical deterioration with time. Lojic + and Permite C showed clinicall
y slight but statistically more surface roughness and marginal fractur
e, while Lojic + and GS-80 showed more surface tarnishing, than did th
e other alloys. There were no statistically significant differences be
tween the alloys for marginal staining.