We investigated whether vertical-shear disparity was extracted from th
e whole visual field or from a more local area and how global estimate
s of vertical disparity are derived, We also investigated the role of
cyclovergence in processing shear disparity, Random-dot stereoscopic d
isplays in various configurations were presented with horizontal-shear
disparity, vertical-shear disparity or same-sign horizontal- and vert
ical-shear (rotation) disparity. Vertical-shear disparity introduced i
nto only the right half of a 60 deg-wide display produced perceived in
clination of the whole display when the center of shear was on the fov
ea, but did not produce inclination, either of the whole display or of
a local area when the centre of shear was in an eccentric retinal pos
ition, A display containing dots with vertical-shear disparity mixed w
ith dots with zero-disparity produced one inclined surface, Horizontal
-shear disparity always produced inclination confined to the local are
a of disparity, Rotation disparity produced no inclination when introd
uced into the whole display, but when introduced with zero-disparity d
ots it produced an inclined plane distinct from the plane defined by t
he zero-disparity dots, These results could be attributed to cycloverg
ence, which we therefore eliminated in our last experiment. We conclud
e that the perception of surface inclination is based on the differenc
e between local horizontal-shear disparity and global vertical-shear d
isparity averaged over the whole visual field. Copyright (C) 1996 Else
vier Science Ltd