The serum MUC1 markers CASA and CA 15-3 were compared with CA 125 in t
he serum of patients with ovarian cancer and in pregnant women. Used i
ndividually, CASA and CA 15-3 gave sensitivities of 54 and 56% in pre-
operative ovarian carcinoma (n = 50), though these were lower than wit
h CA 125 (84%). CASA levels were elevated in 3 women with a negative C
A 125, while CA 15-3 was elevated in 2 of these women. The combined us
e of CA 125 with CASA or CA 15-3 led to the preclinical detection of r
ecurrence in 4/5 patients, with mean lead times of 3.6 and 4.3 months,
respectively. Of particular interest was the marked difference in rea
ctivity observed with CASA and CA 15-3 in some patients, despite both
assays utilising monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that react with the MUC1
mucin. CA 15-3 and CASA showed a lower than expected correlation in p
atients with ovarian cancer (r = 0.70), with some patients having high
concentrations of one mucin marker and low concentrations of another.
Furthermore, different marker profiles were observed when monitoring
the progress of patients with these markers. Marked differences betwee
n CA 15-3 and CASA were also observed in the serum of pregnant women (
n = 10), where CASA showed marked elevation (mean 33.6 times cutpoint)
and CA 15-3 did not (mean 0.88 times cutpoint). These data suggest th
at the specificities of the MAbs used in these assays affect the glyco
form of MUC1 detected, and that it should not be assumed that all MUC1
assays will behave in the same manner.