PURPOSE: To determine the value of follow-up computed tomography (CT)
after expectant treatment in patients with clinically stable blunt spl
enic trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records and CT studies for
42 patients were reviewed, and injuries were graded on a scale of 1-6
. Patients were divided into three groups: stable patients with no fol
low-up CT (group 1, n = 14), stable patients with follow-up CT (group
2, n = 22), and symptomatic patients with follow-up (group 3, n = 6).
Serial hemoglobin values and clinical findings at follow-up CT were re
viewed. RESULTS: All patients in groups 1 and 2 remained clinically st
able with good outcomes. In group 3, follow-up CT scans demonstrated w
orsening condition in four patients (67%), and three of the four had p
oor outcomes. CONCLUSION: Follow-up CT may be unnecessary in patients
with clinically stable splenic trauma.