Tf. Peter et al., DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PCR ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF LOW-LEVELS OF COWDRIA-RUMINANTIUM INFECTION IN AMBLYOMMA TICKS NOT DETECTED BY DNA-PROBE, Journal of clinical microbiology, 33(1), 1995, pp. 166-172
The sensitivities of a PCR assay and a DNA probe assay were compared f
or the detection of Cowdria ruminantium in Amblyomma ticks that were f
ed on C. ruminantium-infected, clinically reacting, and recovered carr
ier animals. The PCR assay and DNA probe detected infection in 86.0 an
d 37.0%, respectively, of 100 ticks fed on a febrile animal. In 75 tic
ks fed on carrier animals, PCR and the DNA probe detected infection in
28.0 and 1.33% of ticks, respectively. This demonstrates that the DNA
probe has poor sensitivity for the detection of low levels of infecti
on in ticks and that PCR is necessary for this purpose. The PCR assay
had a detection limit of between 1 and 10 C. ruminantium organisms and
did not amplify DNA from Ehrlichia canis, which is phylogenetically c
losely related to C. ruminantium, Theileria parva, or uninfected Ambly
omma hebraeum or A. variegatum. PCR detected infection in A. hebraeum
and A. variegatum adult ticks infected with one of six geographically
different C. ruminantium strains. Amplification was also possible from
desiccated ticks and ticks fixed in 70% ethanol, 10% buffered formali
n, or 2% glutaraldehyde. The PCR assay supersedes the DNA probe and ol
der detection methods for the detection of C. ruminantium in ticks, pa
rticularly those fed on carrier animals, and is suitable for both pros
pective and retrospective studies which require accurate detection of
C. ruminantium in individual ticks. Application of the PCR assay shoul
d significantly improve the understanding of heartwater epidemiology,
particularly through the determination of field tick infection rates.