Td. Lauder et al., LUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHY SCREEN - OPTIMIZING THE NUMBER OF MUSCLES STUDIED, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 73(6), 1994, pp. 394-402
The literature is unclear as to which muscles and how many are require
d for a sensitive lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) screen. A retrospect
ive study of 247 electrodiagnostically confirmed LSRs in 201 patients
over a 3-yr period was conducted to determine how many muscles were re
quired to identify a LSR. All LSRs showed abnormal spontaneous activit
y (positive waves or fibrillation potentials) in two or more muscles i
nnervated by the same nerve root level but different peripheral nerves
. All cases were categorized by radiculopathy level, and the most freq
uently abnormal individual muscles were combined into different muscle
screens. The frequency with which each muscle screen identified a rad
iculopathy was the frequency with which one or more muscles in the scr
een displayed abnormal spontaneous activity divided by the total numbe
r of radiculopathies. The paraspinal muscles (PM) alone identified 88%
of LSRs. Without PM, two muscle screens identified only 14-68%, three
muscle screens identified 37-89% and four muscle screens identified 4
5-92%. Including PM, three muscle screens identified 86-94% of LSRs, f
our muscle screens identified 91-97% and five muscle screens yielded 9
4-98% identification. Seven to ten muscle screens resulted in minimal
improvements in identifying a LSR with 98-99% identification. We concl
ude that five muscle LSR screens, including PM, are sufficient to iden
tify LSRs while minimizing patient discomfort and examiner time.