The semiconductor industry is often cited as a ''strategic'' industry
in part because important learning-by-doing spillovers may justify spe
cial industrial policies. Documenting the precise nature of these spil
lovers is crucial for determining the advisability of such policies an
d is helpful for understanding the contribution of learning to endogen
ous growth. Yet existing empirical evidence on learning by doing in se
miconductor production is scant and evidence on spillovers is nonexist
ent. Using quarterly, firm-level data on seven generations of dynamic
random access memory (DRAM) semiconductors over 1974-92, we find that
(a) learning rates average 20 percent, (b) firms learn three times mor
e from an additional unit of their own cumulative production than from
an additional unit of another firm's cumulative production, (c) learn
ing spills over just as much between firms in different countries as b
etween firms within a given country, (d) Japanese firms are indistingu
ishable from others in learning speed, and (e) intergenerational learn
ing spillovers are weak, being marginally significant in only two of s
even DRAM generations.